Social Media Profiling: The Cambridge Analytica Affair and the Big Five

The phrase “If it’s free, you’re the product” is often used to describe business models where companies offer services at no cost to the user and instead make money by selling the user’s data or attention to advertisers. This phrase succinctly captures the trade-off in many digital and online services, especially social media platforms, where users do not pay for access but provide valuable data that the companies monetize.

To understand this phenomena, the Cambridge Analytica story is a prominent example of how personal data can be leveraged for political gain, significantly involving the Big Five personality model.  Here’s a brief overview, focusing on the role of the Big Five model, how it was utilized, and the broader implications:

Background

Cambridge Analytica was a British political consulting firm that came into the spotlight in 2018 after it was revealed that the company had improperly acquired personal data from millions of Facebook users without their consent. This data was then used to target American voters in the 2016 presidential election.

The Big Five Personality Model

The Big Five personality traits, also known as the OCEAN model, include Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. This model is widely used in psychology to describe human personality. The relevance of this model to the Cambridge Analytica scandal lies in its use to profile individuals and predict their behavior, preferences, and likely political inclinations based on their digital footprints.

Utilization of the Big Five Model

Cambridge Analytica, leveraging a quiz app developed by researcher Aleksandr Kogan, gathered data from millions of Facebook users and their network of friends. Users were led to believe the quiz was for academic purposes. However, the collected data, including likes, shares, and other engagement metrics, were analyzed to infer personality traits according to the Big Five model. These inferences were then used to create detailed psychological profiles.

Political Microtargeting

The psychological profiles created from the Big Five model allowed Cambridge Analytica to engage in highly targeted political advertising. By understanding individual personality traits, the firm could tailor messages that would resonate more deeply with specific groups or even individuals, enhancing the effectiveness of political campaigns. This method was notably used during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and the Brexit referendum campaign, sparking widespread debate,  about the ethics and legality of such practices.

Implications and Aftermath

The revelation of this data misuse had several significant implications:

• Privacy Concerns: The scandal highlighted the vulnerabilities in personal data privacy on social media platforms and raised questions about the responsibilities of tech companies in protecting user data.
• Regulatory Response: It prompted calls for tighter regulation of digital advertising and the use of personal data in political campaigns. Notably, it contributed to the urgency and enforcement of data protection laws, like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU.
• Public Awareness: There was a marked increase in public awareness about data privacy, the potential for manipulation through social media, and the ethical considerations of targeted advertising.
• Tech Industry Impact: The scandal led to significant scrutiny of Facebook’s data practices, resulting in substantial fines and changes in how the platform handles third-party data access and user privacy.

Personalchemy.io will never sell your personal data 🙂